Jump to:Page Content
The plaintiffs alleged that the deck railing was defectively designed in that the area surrounding a gate in the railing was not properly shielded, permitting a dangerous gap to form when the gate was open. The parties settled before trial for $90,000. Platt v. Bentley Indus.
The Products Liability Law Reporter is endowed by Perry & Haas, L.L.P., and Robb & Robb, LLC
The endowers have no control over the placement of information or the editorial content of the Products Liability Law Reporter.